[Swiftwater Gazette] Snopes Integrity

Ed kroposki kroposki at att.net
Wed Oct 19 05:29:29 EDT 2016

This has been known about Snopes for years. 
And even truth or fiction is not necessarily accurate.
And search engines such as Google do not intentionally find things, especially bad things about Hillary.
And some browsers are in the tank.
There are ways to find hidden or miniscule information, but they take time and effort.
One interesting tool is a browser, 'Tor' and its tool, 
And see:
Searchengine bias: What search results are telling you (and what they'renot)
Search-enginebias affects our perception of what online information is available,is that a good thing or not? Are there risks?
ByMichael Kassner | in IT Security


    On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 6:37 PM, Elgin Alexander <elginalexander at erols.com> wrote:

 <!--#yiv3733169409 _filtered #yiv3733169409 {font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv3733169409 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv3733169409 {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} _filtered #yiv3733169409 {font-family:"Comic Sans MS";panose-1:3 15 7 2 3 3 2 2 2 4;}#yiv3733169409 #yiv3733169409 p.yiv3733169409MsoNormal, #yiv3733169409 li.yiv3733169409MsoNormal, #yiv3733169409 div.yiv3733169409MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;}#yiv3733169409 a:link, #yiv3733169409 span.yiv3733169409MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3733169409 a:visited, #yiv3733169409 span.yiv3733169409MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3733169409 p.yiv3733169409MsoAcetate, #yiv3733169409 li.yiv3733169409MsoAcetate, #yiv3733169409 div.yiv3733169409MsoAcetate {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma", sans-serif;}#yiv3733169409 span.yiv3733169409BalloonTextChar {font-family:"Tahoma", sans-serif;}#yiv3733169409 p.yiv3733169409m5791540998703064072m-6303552602978088508aolmailmsonormal, #yiv3733169409 li.yiv3733169409m5791540998703064072m-6303552602978088508aolmailmsonormal, #yiv3733169409 div.yiv3733169409m5791540998703064072m-6303552602978088508aolmailmsonormal {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;}#yiv3733169409 span.yiv3733169409hoenzb {}#yiv3733169409 span.yiv3733169409EmailStyle21 {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;color:#1F497D;}#yiv3733169409 span.yiv3733169409EmailStyle22 {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;color:#1F497D;}#yiv3733169409 span.yiv3733169409EmailStyle23 {font-family:"Arial", sans-serif;color:windowtext;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;}#yiv3733169409 .yiv3733169409MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv3733169409 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv3733169409 div.yiv3733169409WordSection1 {}--> I received the e-mail below from a friend who is usually quite reputable.  If true quite unsettling – but not surprising.  Elgin 

Many of the emails that I have sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes.  I thought that was odd. Check this out. Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros; a big time supporter of Obama. In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions. I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice, Elena Kagan who Obama appointed and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets so I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there. So Here is what I wrote to Snopes: Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it. That being said, I'll bet you didn't know this. Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly. Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out! Now we know why Obama nominated Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there. Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what? Elena Kagan is the attorney representing Obama! Check out these examples:http://www.supremecourt.gov/Se arch.aspx?FileName=/docketfile s/09-8857.htm  http://www.supremecourt.gov/Se arch.aspx?FileName=/docketfile s/09-6790.htm  http://www.supremecourt.gov/Se arch.aspx?FileName=/docketfile s/09-724.htm  If you are not interested in justice or in truth, simply delete. However, if you hold sacred the freedoms granted to you by the U.S. Constitution; by all means, PASS it ON!   Is there truly tyranny afoot? p.s.  I now usehttp://www.truthorfiction.c om/to get the correct info..    

  -- Judy Hilinski

  -- Mrs. Maria Di LibertoWorld Language Dept.
SwiftwaterGazette mailing list
SwiftwaterGazette at mailman.theswiftwatergazette.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.theswiftwatergazette.com/pipermail/swiftwatergazette/attachments/20161019/945e4f1c/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the SwiftwaterGazette mailing list